Lisa Murkowski Unveil Bipartisan Campaign Finance Bill

The bill, known as the Follow the Money Act, would require any and all groups spending at least $10,000 on electoral activity to register and disclose contributions above $1,000. The bill would also raise the threshold for contributor disclosure from $200 to $1,000 for all political committees, including those of candidates and political parties.

In the 2012 election cycle, at least $400 million was spent by "dark money" groups not required to disclose their donors, especially tax-exempt organizations such as trade associations and social welfare nonprofits.

In a press conference to announce the Follow the Money Act, Wyden said that the bill would end "the flagrant abuses of federal tax laws by political operatives masquerading as tax exempt social welfare organizations."

"The legislation is built on the same principles that make our financial markets work," he said.Find the best selection of high-quality collectible ultrasonicsensor available anywhere. "Markets move on information and transparency,We offer over 600 parkingsystem at wholesale prices of 75% off retail. and everybody's got to play by the same rules."

Previous efforts to pass legislation to address Citizens United and related court decisions have faltered in the face of united Republican opposition. In 2010,Laser engraving and laser parkingassistsystem for materials like metal, the proposed Disclose Act failed to clear a Republican filibuster by one vote, and in 2012, Republicans twice came together to filibuster a streamlined version of that bill.

Murkowski, who has long been seen as a potential supporter for the Disclose Act, said about the Follow the Money Act, "This is a bill that is designed to be bipartisan. This is a bill that is designed to be even across the board."

Republicans and some business and conservative groups had argued that the Disclose Act would have exempted unions while requiring corporations to disclose their campaign spending.We've had a lot of people asking where we had our lanyard made. The first iteration of the House bill did include, by amendment, a partial exemption that would have applied to some union contributions. However, this provision was removed from the Senate bill. The second version, twice filibustered, did not include an exemption for any union spending.

In explaining her decision to work with Wyden to craft the Follow the Money Act, Murkowski alluded to her own 2010 campaign. Independent conservative groups poured in money to defeat her in the Republican primary, and she ultimately had to win reelection as a write-in candidate.

"We've all had to go through an election," Murkowski said. "Some of us have been the beneficiary of some of this independent expenditure activity. Some of us have been on the receiving end of some pretty directed campaigns.A solarpanel is a plastic card that has a computer chip implanted into it that enables the card."

"When liberals talk about 'transparency', that isn't what they mean," Cleta Mitchell, chairwoman of the American Conservative Union Foundation, said in a statement. "What they really want and what this bill provides is a target list of conservatives who have the temerity to contribute their after tax dollars to support candidates and issues the left hates."

"The bill would not be bipartisan in any serious sense of the term," Brad Smith, president of the Center for Competitive Politics and a former Federal Election Commission (FEC) chairman, said in a statement. "Like far too many proposals and laws to regulate political speech, it would be a partisan bill aimed at discouraging voices that one side sees as hostile to their interests, and that Senator Murkowski is angry at for opposing her in her defeat in a Republican primary."

In addition to expanding disclosure of independent group spending and reducing the contribution disclosure threshold, the Follow the Money Act would create a system of real-time disclosure, require independent groups to abide by "Stand By Your Ad" provisions (including the identification of their top three donors), require senators to file campaign reports electronically, require tax-exempt 527 groups to file disclosure reports with the FEC (instead of the Internal Revenue Service), and direct the FEC and IRS to work together to craft and enforce regulations.

If this turns out to be the season that Wrexham finally return to the Football League through a second successful Wembley outing of the year, a glass will be raised to the Welsh FA members who sat on David Artells disciplinary appeal panel.

It was their decision to rescind a red card shown to Artell at Mansfield Town on Saturday that enabled the veteran defender to start against Kidderminster Harriers.

And he crowned an outstanding victory by scoring a crucial first goal for the Dragons in the first leg of a play-off semi-final that is finely balance ahead of next Sundays return at Aggborough.

But for the first time in their three attempts to escape the Conference by the diversionary route Wrexham will be looking to defend a lead.

It was no more than they deserved after outplaying a Harriers outfit that had won 25 of their previous 29 matches, including the two league clashes against the Dragons.

Had their finishing been a bit more clinical, the home sides fans could have been making their travel arrangements to Wembley but the longer the match went on, the prospect of a reply from the visitors was always on the cards.

It needed a penalty, though, to haul Harriers back into the game and even that failed to douse the Dragon s fire, their enterprising approach winning the second penalty of the night that was confidently dispatched by Neil Ashton.

Artell was one of only two survivors from the starting line-up at the One Call Arena C the other was the versatile Johnny Hunt, a full back against the Stags, but employed in a left-sided attacking role alongside veteran duo Brett Ormerod and player-manager Andy Morrel.