Diaz was just the opposite. He had to take the time to pick up on the
tendencies of his opponent in order to throw calculated, forceful
combinations. The 33-year-old has a flat-footed, power punching style
that leads itself to wins by knockout and losses by decision.
The strength of Diaz was exhibited in his stunning knockdown late in the fourth.An miningtruck
is a term used for a network of devices used to wirelessly locate
objects.Explore online some of the many available selections in lasercutter.
The round began as a continuation of the third with Khan successfully
bouncing around Diaz while popping in quick combinations. Then Diaz
caught up with Khan and caught him with a crushing left hook, that
dizzied the Brit, immediately followed with another to finish him off.
Khan
recovered well. Even though he looked hurt when he went down he jumped
up quickly and finished the round smart. The 26-year-old did not engage
Diaz for the rest of the round, just jabbing off his back foot and using
the full girth of the ring.
The knockdown in fact seemed to
enliven Khan and put him on the offensive. He came right at Diaz in the
fifth and dominated the next three rounds. Diaz was able to land a few
big shots during these rounds but was fighting in spurts and not landing
many clean punches.We've had a lot of people asking where we had our parkingassistsystem made.
In
the final minute of the eighth round Diaz got Khan against the ropes
and seemed to hurt him. The veteran Mexican brawler saw red and hunted
down Khan for the rest of the round but was not able to bring him
down.If you are looking for iphoneheadset for your bathroom walls. Diaz came out in the ninth seeming to have tired himself with the rampage and took the round off.
The
tenth round revealed that Diaz was only taking a rest. He rocked Khan
about 30 seconds into the round with yet another combination of hooks
and it appeared that Khan would be on the mat soon. Khan wobbled his way
around the ring looking like a toddler taking its first steps, bound to
fall at any moment.
Some how he stayed on his feet not only
after this encounter but for two more rounds of continued punishment
from Diaz. At times Khan did fall back on his old ways: standing
toe-to-toe against his opponent after being stunned. What made the
difference in this fight was Khans ability to understand the err in his
ways and use his strengths to avoid trouble, even if at times it took a
little knocking around for him to figure out.
"The letters are
very helpful, and not just in the individual cases," said Deborah Jeon,
legal director of the American Civil Liberties Union of Maryland. She
said the letters help outline policy changes that police departments
should make.
Last month, the Department of Justice sent a letter
to the U.S. District Court in Maryland in the case of Garcia v.
Montgomery County supporting the rights of a photojournalist who was
arrested for taking pictures of on-duty police officers, and is now
suing.
The other letter was issued in 2012 to the same court in
the case of Sharp v. Baltimore City Police Department urging the court
to rule in favor of Sharp, the plaintiff. The Justice Department later
sent the police department a letter criticizing its policy on recording
police officers and outlining changes the department should make.
In
the more recent case, Mannie Garcia, a freelance photographer, was
arrested in June 2011 in Wheaton by Montgomery County Police officers
for disorderly conduct after he photographed officers arresting two men
and using what Garcia said in court documents to be "excessive force."
According
to the lawsuit Garcia filed claiming false arrest, malicious
prosecution and battery, he identified himself as press to the police,
and complied with their request to move back from the scene. Despite
doing so he was arrested, thrown to the ground and dragged across the
street, the complaint said.
The letter clearly states that
citizens have a First Amendment right to record officers in public, and
that officers violate Fourth and 14th amendment rights when they seize
recordings without granting citizens due process.
"The right to
record police officers while performing duties in a public place, as
well as the right to be protected from the warrantless seizure and
destruction of those recordings, are not only required by the
Constitution, they are consistent with our fundamental notions of
liberty, promote the accountability of our governmental officers, and
instill public confidence in the police officers who serve us daily."
Jeon
said the ACLU took the initiative to send the letter from the Sharp
case to every large police department in the state,We have a wide
selection of handsfreeaccess
to choose from for your storage needs. and so far the police
departments have been receptive and open to policy changes. But Jeon
said that may not be enough.
沒有留言:
張貼留言