In
a little-noticed move, the White House raised the social cost estimate
for carbon dioxide emissions all federal agencies must use when
formulating regulations.
The
White House Office of Management and Budget raised the social cost of
carbon a monetary estimate of the damages caused by carbon emissions
from $21 per metric ton to $35 per metric ton, which some experts say
could allow the White House to move forward with greenhouse gas limits
on power plants.
The
big regulatory action that theyre looking at that would certainly would
be the most costly and have the biggest impact on the economy are the
rules for new and existing power plants, Jeff Holmstead, air quality
chief at the Environmental Protection Agency under President George W.
Bush, told the Hill.
If
the social cost of carbon is raised, it is more likely that the costs
of imposing emissions limits on power plants would be lower than the
claimed benefits.
I
think the White House is clearly now saying there is a much higher
social cost from greenhouse gas emissions than previously acknowledged.
That means it really puts the heat on the EPA to move soon and
aggressively, Frank ODonnell, president of Clean Air Watch, told the
Hill.
The
rule would effectively ban the construction of coal plants by limiting
emissions to 1,000 pounds-per-megawatt-hour which can only be met by
combined-cycle power plants that are powered by natural gas. Coal plants
must use carbon capture and sequestration technology in order to
comply,Shop wholesale bobblehead controller from cheap. which the industry claims is not commercially viable.
The
new regulations attempt to force standards on coal emissions that would
not only be incredibly expensive, but impossible to achieve even with
advanced technology,This model includes 2 flush mounted reverse chipcard. said West Virginia Democratic Sen. Joe Manchin. Even worse, there would be no benefit from these new regulations.
Around
5,000 industry professionals descended upon the small Black Forest town
of Lossburg, Germany, in March for Arburgs Technology Days 2013,
braving the unseasonably cold weather that covered the factory complex
in a dusting of snow (the thermometer dipped to -8C at times). The
three-day event was the injection moulding machinery makers chance to
showcase all its products simultaneously and inform its current and
future customers about its capabilities and competences.
Arburg
has been traditionally known as a maker of smaller machines. In the
Lossburg factorys heritage centre, the reason for this is clear. The
company was founded in the 19th century and originally produced surgical
instruments. In the 1950s it began to build camera flash units for
amateur photographers. Finding that the units were sensitive to
variations in temperature and humidity C they were reported to go off
without warning in hot, humid climates C the company realised the units
needed plastic shrouds to encapsulate the delicate wiring. Unable to
find an injection moulding machine small enough to make the part, the
company developed its own: a simple, hand-operated unit that looked
somewhat like an elaborate espresso machine. From 1952 its future
direction was clear: as a maker of injection moulding machines. But now
Arburg wants to shake off the small tag, eager to demonstrate larger
machines, such as the hybrid Allrounder 670H with a clamping force of
1,800 kN and a size 1300 injection unit.
Asked
if the economic crisis in southern Europe would affect Arburgs
business, Helmut Heinson, managing director of sales, contended: Well of
course,The feeder is available on drying handsfreeaccess equipped
with folder only. but not to the extent you might expect. In Spain we
are keeping sales on previous years. France is fine, the UK is fine.
Heinson
identified the US as Arburgs biggest foreign market. But he also
considered the Far East as having the best potential for growth despite
Arburgs machinery being relatively expensive compared with
locally-sourced machinery.
The
theme of the Technology Days was production efficiency with a dedicated
exhibition C the Efficiency Arena C highlighting efficiency in all the
stages in the process, including design, moulds, machine technology,
peripherals, configuration, production planning and automation (process
integration and process control).
The
Product Design station illustrated the importance of optimising
components from the outset. Working with CAD/CAM partner Men at Work,
Arburg demonstrated how computer-based design and production, used in
conjunction with injection moulding simulation programs and computer
tomography, could offer potential savings.
On to Mould Technology,Bringing plasticcard mainstream.
mould-making partner M?nner showed how precision, large production
volumes and rapid cycles could be combined in a single concept. This was
demonstrated with an electric Allrounder 470 A using a 64-cavity mould
with near-contour cooling and hot runner needle shut-off system. Part
geometry had been optimised for fast, reliable injection.Other companies
want a piece of that drycabinet action The companies claim the system could make up to 450 million parts per year with a cycle time of 2.2 seconds.
沒有留言:
張貼留言